Fourth Circuit Overturns $1.6 Million Dollar Verdict in Race Discrimination Case

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/23/2014
When the Washington Bullets (remember them?) won the 1978 NBA Championship, Coach Dick Motta inspired fans with the phrase "the opera ain't over till the fat lady sings."  That phrase came to mind this week when I read about a decision reversing a $1.6 million dollar verdict against CSX Transportation in a race discrimination case.  Bennett v. CSX Transportation, 4th Cir. No. 12-2477 ( unpublished 1/21/14). In Bennett, an African-American former...
read more

Federal Courts Considering Revisions to Electronic Discovery Rules

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/21/2014
As any employer who has been through a federal court lawsuit can attest, litigation costs make the defense of employment lawsuits a costly proposition. In many cases, the costs of defense are greater than the potential recovery if the employee wins the case. Perhaps the biggest driver  of litigation costs is what has become known as "electronic discovery" or "e-discovery."  This is the process of  preserving, reviewing,  and disclosing emails...
read more

Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Validity of NLRB Recess Appointments

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/17/2014
It turns out that schoolchildren aren’t the only ones who care about how long recess is.  On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, a case that is expected to decide how to allocate power between the President and Senate when it comes to recess appointments and could result in the invalidation of hundreds of NLRB decisions . For those unfamiliar with the case, by January 3,...
read more

Recording Supervisor's Racially Offensive Remarks Leads to Reduced Jury Verdict

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/15/2014
Baiting your supervisor to make racially offensive comments while secretly recording the conversation might seem like a great way to score a big settlement out of your employer.  However, that strategy can prove to be something of a double-edged sword -- at least  in the eyes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Johnson v. STRIVE E. Harlem Emp’t Grp., No. 1:12-cv-04460 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2014). Rob...
read more

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights Issues Poster for New Pregnancy Discrimination Law

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/13/2014
As we have previously reported, on October 1, 2013, the Reasonable Accommodations for Disabilities Due to Pregnancy Act took effect for Maryland employers who have 15 or more employees. The new law requires that, unless an employer can show undue hardship, it must provide pregnant employees with various categories of accommodations upon request, including: changing the employee’s job duties; changing the employee’s work hours; relocating the...
read more

Some Thoughts on the ADA

Frank Kollman
Frank Kollman
01/10/2014
There was a thoughtful piece in the Wall Street Journal today written by Joni Eareckson Tada, who happens to be quadriplegic.  She was commenting on a recent "wrongful birth" case and efforts by some legislatures to legalize euthanasia of people with disabilities.  I think the following paragraph summarizes her thoughts: This winter, the American Medical Association classified obesity as a disability. We need to make up our minds. We cannot...
read more

Nursing Home's Limited Accommodations Deemed Unlawful Pregnancy Discrimination

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that a nursing home’s policy of accommodating only restrictions from work-related incidents could be pretext for pregnancy discrimination.  Latowski v. Northwoods Nursing Center, No. 12-2408 (6th Cir. Dec. 23, 2013). Jennifer Latowski was employed as a certified nursing assistant (“CNA”) by Northwoods Nursing Center in Michigan.  Her doctor recommended a 50-pound lifting...
read more

Maryland Court Allows Sex Harassment Claim Against Ledo's Pizza to Proceed

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
01/02/2014
Just prior to Christmas, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied in part a motion to dismiss filed by Ledo’s Pizza & Pasta and permitted a 16 year old  plaintiff  to move forward on her sexual harassment claims, but not her claims of disparate treatment and national origin discrimination. Lopez v. BMA Corp., No. DKC 13-2406, 2013 BL 354687 (D. Md. Dec. 24, 2013). Plaintiff Rosa Lopez filed suit as parent and...
read more

Two Associational Discrimination Claims Treated Differently By Federal Court In Pennsylvania

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
12/27/2013
During the past month, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has reached the opposite result in two cases involving claims of associational discrimination —  claims where the plaintiff alleges that he was discriminated against because of his association with others of a different race.  In Terry v. Yeadon Borough, No. 12-6205 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2013), the court concluded that the plaintiff’s claims could...
read more

“But-For This,” “But-For That” -- Multiple “But-For” Causes Possible In Title VII Retaliation Claim

Kollman & Saucier
Kollman & Saucier
12/26/2013
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals delivered Zann Kwan an early Christmas present earlier this month when it concluded that her former employer was not entitled to summary judgment on her retaliation claim.  Zann Kwan v. Andalex Grp. LLC, No. 12-2493 (2d Cir. Dec. 16, 2013).  From April 2007 until September 2008 Zann Kwan worked as the Vice President of Acquisitions for The Andalex Group, a small family-owned real estate management company based...
read more
Email Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Loading